|
|
Chapter I
|
|
|
|
General Principles of Physics -
Alchemical Physics |
|
|
|
Legends concerning the birth of the
worlds are quite numerous. This question has always set the
human spirit to work, as the various legends that exist the
world over bear witness. The literature on the subject is
vast and anyone who desires to study the subject in full can
refer to it. |
|
However, these poetical and philosophical
legends could not satisfy those who wanted palpable proof
and those whose scientific disposition urged to mathematical
research. As legends increased and centuries elapsed, these
researches have ended up in scientific theories that new
discoveries - or more precisely the renewal of secular
philosophic discoveries - threaten with disuse. At present,
the Academies are informed of works that prove the original
error of theories recently admitted as true. These new
conceptions are naturally thrust aside, for they destroy all
the work of the modem and contemporary writers who must now
respond by orienting their research in a different direction
and renounce an entire part of work and value. |
|
The problem of the origin of things is
still insufficiently solved by the atomic constitution of
bodies, for it does not give the essence of these bodies or
the constitution of Matter. |
|
Some years ago, scholars came to admit
that the bodies - which they had previously considered
simple - were also decomposable. Subsequently, the theory of
atomism, which considered Matter as extended and indivisible
substance (Haatan 3e p. 76) was succeeded by the new theory
of ions (Archemius), that of electrons (atoms of Bohr)
followed, to end up in the theory of quanta of energy
(Einstein). |
|
By affinity, atoms group together and
form molecules and thus move in Ether. “The exchange of
energy between Ether and atomic Matter brings about the most
important phenomena of physics and chemistry.” |
|
But, as we have just mentioned, though
this theory is not totally rejected, it is subject to
modifications, which will undoubtedly be succeeded by a new
comprehension that will tend to establish the unity of
Matter. |
|
In the meantime, with the support of both
legend and science, let us broach the Orphic Tradition so as
to explain the great problem of Creation. |
|
We have seen that the scientific world
explains Creation by the transmission of Movement in
Extent. This is the theory of atomism or, according to
another form, the theory of mechanism. The School of
Descartes holds that Extent is the essence of Matter and
consequently declares that there is neither body without
extent, nor extent without body (Haatan p. 46). |
|
The Orphic tradition shows that by their
combination, these two theories would be of a less relative
truth. In fact, the Orphic Tradition explains Creation as
the outcome of the play of two movements: Emotivity and
Activity. These two virtues are in a latent state in the
Being since, as the Cosmopolitan says, “It must nevertheless
be noted that the limit of Nature is God, since He is its
principle, for everything ends in the source from which it
took its being and its beginning.” (Law of the Circle.) |
|
Let us return to the two movements, that
of Emotivity and that of Activity, both of which emanated
from the Source of all things. In order to accept their
action, we must understand that movement is not always the
same and that for the moment we must rise above our physical
and material concepts. |
|
Now the first movement, that of Activity
or penetration (Tropos) acts by radiation against the second
movement, that of Emotivity or envelopment (Pathos). When
these two movements meet, a creation is made - that of
Substance. By its virtue of penetration, Tropos has created
Space (Cartesianism). And by its enveloping movement, Pathos
responds to the impact of Tropos and creates Time (movement
of mechanism.) |
|
By mutual contribution and without any
lapse or stop in their state. SPACE and TIME, produce FORM
(combination of the two theories). |
|
As you can very well see, the Orphic
tradition explains Creation in response to movement and
extent. |
|
Although this first creation does not
respond in any way to the one that we discover, it is well
known that every impulse given has a repercussion in space,
and due to the Resistance put up by Matter, it weakens in
penetrations and is transformed into an enveloping movement
(apparent Stability). |
|
By its oscillations, the pendulum
demonstrates the attraction that is due to weight, but
because the mass that constitutes it cannot fully manifest
the action of this force, the latter is transformed into
another movement, which is that of rotation. (The experiment
of Foucault’s Pendulum in the Pantheon can be seen in the
Conservatory of Arts and Crafts.) The combination of these
two movements - attraction and rotation - can permit us to
understand the phenomena of rhabdomancy (the sorcerer’s wand
or water-diviners). |
|
This first creation of Substance, this
synthesis, was named the Luciferian Creation because it
became separate from the Being and was opposed to Its
activity. |
|
From the above study, we gather that
Movement is the quality of all conscious or unconscious
dynamism. |
|
“Movement was the life of the All. And
the All was the unique personality of movement”. (Today we
call movement, Dynamism, Force, Supreme Force, Universal
Conscience, God.) |
|
We mentioned above that in physical and
material mode, movement was animated by divers multiple and
transformable activities throughout Creation. |
|
Thus, the contact of the two initial
movements produced a dynamic knot. This is what we call
‘SUBSTANCE’. |
|
In turn, substance was animated by two
movements, one of Resistance - which is the transformation
of the movement of Penetration - and one of Compression -
which is the transformation of the Enveloping movement. |
|
The opposition put up by the movements of
Resistance and Compression to the efforts of the movement of
Penetration, changed the latter into a deflagrating force
that produced a particular state of Substance: Igneous
Nature, the mother of Matter or of the secondary Creation
that we know. |
|
|
|
We shall study this Igneous Nature in the
next chapter. |
|
|